INVESTIGATIVE POST: Governor Andrew Cuomo directed state environmental regulators to move “quickly and thoroughly” on an investigation of a toxic landfill with a Love Canal legacy in the Town of Wheatfield.
Cuomo wants the Department of Environmental Conservation to collect soil and groundwater samples from residential yards in the neighborhoods closest to the landfill “to determine whether offsite migration of contaminants has occurred.”
The DEC, so far, has maintained that chemicals have been confined to the landfill.
Current and former neighbors of the landfill, and their attorneys, have contended in a lawsuit that their soil tests show that landfill chemicals already have contaminated their properties.
“We think that this testing should have happened years ago,” said Mike Stag, one of the attorneys representing the residents.
“The agencies rushed to judgment and assumed there were no dangerous chemicals getting into the neighborhood. We are confident it will confirm our own testing showing PCBs, dioxins and other Love Canal chemicals on their properties.”
A group of neighbors this month launched a petition to urge Cuomo to act, but the petitioners have asked to be relocated. Some residents on Forbes Street and Forbes Terrace have erected signs on their front yards warning of the toxic landfill.
State officials said sampling will begin within the next month or as soon as the DEC is granted access to test properties off Forbes Street and Forbes Terrace.
The landfill held Love Canal waste from 1968 until 2015, when the state had it removed by Occidental Chemical Corporation. That same year, the DEC deemed the landfill a state Superfund after discovering more contamination.
In response to Investigative Post’s story in February 2015, the town announced plans to construct a fence around the landfill to keep people off the property. That work is expected to start soon. —DAN TELVOCK, INVESTIGATIVE POST
NYET, CARL: Congeniality is not one of Carl Paladino’s traits. The 2010 Republican gubernatorial candidate has for years displayed behavior that casts doubts as to whether the emotional and rational parts of his brain communicate with one another. Nonetheless, Paladino’s bombastic and, at times, insulting remarks haven’t quieted the buzz among political insiders that he could run against Governor Andrew Cuomo in 2018.
A well-informed Republican says: “He was planning to do it, but as far as I know he dropped that idea after his Christmas shot at Michelle Obama. If he is still running, he hasn’t told me or any other close political adviser.”
We won’t repeat the outrageous, racially tinged remark Paladino made about the former first lady in December, but it would definitely go viral again if he were to throw his hat into the 2018 election. “Astorino and Wilson or any other Republican should be concerned with Paladino,” a Republican politico opined. But should Andrew Cuomo? —GERSON BORRERO, CITY & STATE
HOW UNIONS FARE IN THE AGE OF TRUMP: In recent months, the labor movement had been on the winning side of the news cycle. First, President Donald Trump’s nominee for labor secretary, fast food executive Andrew Puzder, was withdrawn. Then the push to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act collapsed.
But on closer examination, both the Puzder flameout and the healthcare meltdown were mostly due to self-inflicted wounds. The disclosure of Puzder’s domestic violence history and upstate Representatives Chris Collins and John Faso’s attempt to shift county Medicaid costs to their home state exacted a heavy price for Republicans.
In reality, these labor “wins” were rearguard actions by a union movement with fractures between its leadership and its rank and file that Trump, much like former President Ronald Reagan, has already exploited. Trump’s path to the White House was paved when he flipped 200 counties in states like Michigan, Wisconsin, Ohio, and Pennsylvania that voted for former President Barack Obama in 2008 and 2012. Trump did that by winning hundreds of thousands of votes from union members whose leaders had bet big on former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.
John Samuelsen, president of Transport Workers Union Local 100 and who backed Senator Bernie Sanders in last year’s presidential race, said he believes the Democratic Party has lost touch with its blue-collar working-class voters—and Trump has cashed in. Now, Samuelsen said, Trump is courting private sector unions while his budget would lay off thousands of unionized federal workers.
“There is a playbook and it belongs to the illustrious governor of Wisconsin Scott Walker and that playbook was to go after the public sector and sort of tell the uniforms and the trades that everything would be okay and then after he got done gutting the public sector, he gutted everybody else as well,” Samuelsen said. “Walker has had meetings with Trump since the election and hopefully organized labor is not going to be deluded into thinking that can’t happen nationally the way it happened in Wisconsin.”
In 2011, Walker and the Wisconsin state Legislature dismantled decades of labor protections, ending collective bargaining for public unions and requiring them to pay more for their healthcare and pension benefits. Walker withstood a recall election and went on to win re-election.
Since 2011, union membership has dropped by 40 percent in Wisconsin with just eight percent of the state’s workers now in a union, well below the national average of 11 percent. During his own short-lived presidential bid, Walker pledged to eliminate the National Labor Relations Board and end union representation for federal workers. “If you’re a big-government union boss in Washington, this is a threat to you and to all of the politicians that you have under your control in our nation’s capital,” Walker said at a Nevada campaign rally, according to Reuters.
Wisconsin passed a right-to-work law, a measure that historically had traction only in the South and West, but in 2012 a similar measure was enacted in Indiana and Michigan. As early as 1995, the American Legislative Exchange Council, a right-wing think tank supported by the Koch brothers, had been pushing state legislatures to adopt the anti-union measure.
By contrast, New York has the highest percentage of unionized workers in the country, at a time when unions are in a precipitous decline nationally. Between 2000 and 2016, New York’s percentage of workers in a union only fell from 25.5 percent to 23.6 percent and New York is now the only state in the nation where more than 20 percent of the workforce belongs to a union.
Not since the 1920s has the Republican Party, traditionally anti-union, so totally dominated state capitals. As a consequence, both New York’s public and private unions are in the national labor union vanguard, to staunch the bleeding from a movement that began here. Now, activists say distinctions between private and public sector unions have to fall away as they face a battle for survival.
With Congress and the White House in Republican hands, Samuelsen said unions have to anticipate that a more conservative U.S. Supreme Court could make a union comeback an even steeper climb. “Everything is an organizing challenge, whether it be a Supreme Court decision that impacts us negatively in terms of our ability to function and our ability to collect dues or national right-to-work legislation, we can’t just put our heads in the sand,” he said. “We have to get out in front of it.”
A key part of TWU’s strategy is to look for organizing opportunities. “In the private sector, we organize anything that moves, like the tour bus operations and bike share workers here in New York, Philadelphia and out in San Francisco,” he said.
Arthur Cheliotes, president of Communications Workers of America Local 1180, which represents New York City’s supervisory and administrative employees, says his union has expanded into nonprofits. It now represents workers with Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, Planned Parenthood and the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals.
Cheliotes said successful unions today have to not only organize in the workplace but also in the wider community. “It means a grass-roots approach to connect with their members making sure that at the front lines the members understand the value of a union and probably more importantly bring about more militancy,” he said. “Ultimately it should be organized people fighting organized money.” —BOB HENNELLY, CITY & STATE